Skip to content
Cockpit0.29.0
A snapshot: read at commit 707a04c7ce8 on 2026-10-18T00:06:01Z by majordomus 0.29.0. Nothing on this page is read again. See it live

I1962

The evidence gates read subject findings and widgets

Where it stands

devtask.issue
Readiness
blocked 2 of its dependencies are not DONE
Status
BLOCKED
Can start
not now
Milestone
Milestone status
ACTIVE
Wave
6
Waiting on
Holds back
Behind it in all
1
Evidence
0 of 2
In the waySubjectDetail
issueI1960I1960 is not DONE
issueI1953I1953 is not DONE
A move writes the repository: it stamps one field of this issue's record and appends one event to the ledger, and a commit will carry both.
The same moves from a terminal

majordomus plan start I1962

majordomus plan verify I1962

majordomus plan done I1962

What it is

Objective
Make subject findings refusing, rewriting the evidence baseline in the same change, and make the evidence validator read every rendered widget, so that a widget without a subject or a count hard-coded into a template fails CI (ADR 0087 decision 10).
Why
Subject findings stay advisory until a gate reads them, and ADR 0087 names this validator as the mechanism against a widget without a subject and a hard-coded count.
Now
scripts/evidence-check ratchets claims only; subject findings are advisory; no gate reads the site's widgets for a subject; lib/commands.sh and scripts/ci/command-furnished derive command coverage in shell.
Wanted
evidence-check refuses a subject finding beyond the rewritten baseline; a stable feature without evidence and a widget without a subject each fail a gate by name; the shell command-coverage readers read the index artifact or are held equal to it by a case.
Done when
unknown: the record declares no `completion`
Risk
unknown: the record declares no `risk`

Acceptance

  • Subject findings refuse, and the baseline is rewritten in the same change, with its reason
  • A rendered widget without a subject fails the validator, naming the widget
  • A count or a percentage hard-coded into a template fails the validator
  • The shell command-coverage readers agree with the subject index
Validation
bash test/run.sh 522_evidence_check_reads_widgetsbash test/run.sh 523_evidence_rules_are_gatedscripts/evidence-check
Evidence required
subject_findings_refusewidgets_name_subjects
Evidence present
unknown: the record carries no `evidence` entries

Scope

Touches
scripts/evidence-check.ai/repo/evidence-baseline.txtscripts/rust-coveragelib/commands.shscripts/ci/command-furnishedscripts/lib/evidence-widgets.mjsscripts/lib/interactions.mjsscripts/site-check.ai/repo/automation/inventory.jsonl.ai/repo/ci/gates.yaml.ai/repo/rules/project/no-stable-feature-without-a-test.v1.md.ai/repo/rules/project/a-widget-names-its-evidence-subject.v1.md.ai/repo/features/evidence.md.ai/repo/features/coverage.mddocs/CLAIMS.yamldocs/claimstest/cases
Not
Weakening the baseline's ratchet
Depends on
Priority
p1
Profile
implementation
Parallel safe
false
Owner
unknown: the record declares no `owner`

The work so far

Branches
none
Merged
none
Commits
0
Trunk
master
Sessions
none
Created
2026-09-26
Updated
2026-09-26
Started
unknown: the record declares no `started_at`
Verified
unknown: the record declares no `verified_at`
Completed
unknown: the record declares no `completed_at`

Synchronisation

Adapter
scripts/github-sync
Repository
unknown: the derived plan's header carries no repository
External issue
unknown: a live GitHub state; this executable makes no network call, so only `scripts/github-sync --check` can answer it
State there
unknown: a live GitHub state; this executable makes no network call, so only `scripts/github-sync --check` can answer it

Findings

Nothing is wrong with these records.