A snapshot: read at commit 707a04c7ce8 on 2026-10-18T00:06:01Z by majordomus 0.29.0. Nothing on this page is read again. See it live
I1027
A synthetic capability proves the architecture instead of describing it
Where it stands
devtask.issue- Readiness
- blocked 2 of its dependencies are not DONE
- Status
- BLOCKED
- Can start
- not now
- Milestone
- Milestone status
- ACTIVE
- Wave
5- Waiting on
- Holds back
- Behind it in all
1- Evidence
0of2
| In the way | Subject | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| issue | I1018 | I1018 is not DONE |
| issue | I1019 | I1019 is not DONE |
Moves
plan.transitionWhat it is
- Objective
- Register a synthetic capability at its authoritative source alone, and prove it reaches the graph, the interface, the search, the navigation and the static projection with no other edit — and that omitting its required evidence fails enforcement.
- Why
- Every claim in this milestone reduces to one: adding something requires no edit to any surface. That is either demonstrable or it is marketing, and the demonstration is cheap.
- Now
- Nothing proves the loop end to end.
- Wanted
- One test registers a synthetic capability, generates, and asserts its appearance everywhere it should appear — and asserts the failure when its required evidence is missing.
- Done when
- unknown: the record declares no `completion`
- Risk
- A fixture that the implementation learns to recognise proves nothing. It has to be ordinary in every respect.
Acceptance
- The capability is registered only at its authoritative source, and no surface is edited
- After generation it appears in the graph, the interface, the search, the navigation and the static projection
- Omitting its required documentation or verification fails enforcement with a message naming what is missing
- Supplying the evidence makes every check pass
- The fixture is removed afterwards, or kept only where test fixtures belong
- Validation
bash test/run.sh- Evidence required
synthetic_flows_throughenforcement_fires- Evidence present
- unknown: the record carries no `evidence` entries
Scope
- Touches
test/cases- Not
Leaving the synthetic fixture in the repository as if it were a real capabilitySpecial-casing the fixture anywhere in the implementation- Depends on
- Priority
- p0
- Profile
- deep-work
- Parallel safe
- false
- Owner
- unknown: the record declares no `owner`
The work so far
- Branches
- none
- Merged
- none
- Commits
0- Trunk
- master
- Sessions
- none
- Created
- 2026-09-06
- Updated
- 2026-09-06
- Started
- unknown: the record declares no `started_at`
- Verified
- unknown: the record declares no `verified_at`
- Completed
- unknown: the record declares no `completed_at`
Synchronisation
- Adapter
scripts/github-sync- Repository
- unknown: the derived plan's header carries no repository
- External issue
- unknown: a live GitHub state; this executable makes no network call, so only `scripts/github-sync --check` can answer it
- State there
- unknown: a live GitHub state; this executable makes no network call, so only `scripts/github-sync --check` can answer it
Findings
Nothing is wrong with these records.