Struct DisagreementInput 

pub struct DisagreementInput {
    pub assessment: String,
    pub positions: Vec<DisagreementPosition>,
    pub divergent_assumptions: Vec<String>,
    pub discriminating_question: String,
    pub experiment: Option<String>,
}

Advisors, or an advisor and the executor, disagree.

A disagreement names the question whose answer decides between the positions; until a ResolutionInput settles it with evidence, the store refuses every conclusion on its assessment. It needs at least two positions, each from its own source.

use majordomus_cli::reasoning::availability::{ModeResolution, ReasoningMode};
use majordomus_cli::reasoning::record::*;
use majordomus_cli::reasoning::store::{admit, Admission, Loaded};

let mode = ModeResolution { mode: ReasoningMode::Standard, source: "default".into() };
let admission = Admission { mode: &mode, availability: &[] };
let mut loaded = Loaded::default();
loaded.records.push(ReasoningRecord {
    schema: RECORD_SCHEMA.into(),
    version: RECORD_VERSION,
    id: "assessment-1".into(),
    task: "t".into(),
    recorded_at: "2026-10-01T00:00:01Z".into(),
    head: None,
    redacted: vec![],
    body: ReasoningBody::Assessment(AssessmentInput {
        subject: "lock scope".into(),
        ..Default::default()
    }),
});
let lonely = DisagreementInput {
    assessment: "assessment-1".into(),
    positions: vec![DisagreementPosition {
        source: "primary".into(),
        position: "keep the lock".into(),
    }],
    divergent_assumptions: vec![],
    discriminating_question: "does any caller hold it across an await?".into(),
    experiment: None,
};
let refused = admit(ReasoningInput::Disagreement(lonely), &loaded, &admission).unwrap_err();
assert_eq!(refused.0, "a disagreement has at least two positions");

Fields

assessment: String

The assessment it is about.

positions: Vec<DisagreementPosition>

The positions; at least two.

divergent_assumptions: Vec<String>

The assumptions the positions divide on.

discriminating_question: String

The question whose answer decides between them.

experiment: Option<String>

The experiment proposed to answer it.

Trait Implementations

impl Clone for DisagreementInput

fn clone(&self) -> DisagreementInput

Returns a duplicate of the value.

fn clone_from(&mut self, source: &Self)

Performs copy-assignment from source.

impl Debug for DisagreementInput

fn fmt(&self, f: &mut Formatter<'_>) -> Result

Formats the value using the given formatter.

impl<'de> Deserialize<'de> for DisagreementInput

fn deserialize<__D>(__deserializer: __D) -> Result<Self, __D::Error>

where __D: Deserializer<'de>,

Deserialize this value from the given Serde deserializer.

impl JsonSchema for DisagreementInput

fn schema_name() -> Cow<'static, str>

The name of the generated JSON Schema.

fn schema_id() -> Cow<'static, str>

Returns a string that uniquely identifies the schema produced by this type.

fn json_schema(generator: &mut SchemaGenerator) -> Schema

Generates a JSON Schema for this type.

fn inline_schema() -> bool

Whether JSON Schemas generated for this type should be included directly in parent schemas, rather than being re-used where possible using the $ref keyword.

impl Serialize for DisagreementInput

fn serialize<__S>(&self, __serializer: __S) -> Result<__S::Ok, __S::Error>

where __S: Serializer,

Serialize this value into the given Serde serializer.