A coding agent is asked for one change. It makes the change, edits a file nobody asked it to
touch, and reports that it is done. Another agent is already working in the same paths. The
session ends before anyone reads the diff, and the next session starts from whatever the chat
remembered. Every one of those is ordinary, and none of them is a model problem.
start: claims the paths the task may touch, and reports another worker already claiming them
check: refuses a touched file outside the claimed paths
finish: evaluates the finish contract line by line and writes nothing while a line fails
handover: writes the state the next session starts from, into the repository
context: gives the next worker that state back, without the conversation that produced it
setup: challenge
given:
- 'a repository with Majordomus installed, and a second worktree whose worker already claims lib'
- 'a test, test/parse.sh, that passes only when the parser message names the column'
steps:
- id: claim-the-work
note: 'The task claims lib. Another worker already claims lib in a second worktree, and start says so before any file is touched.'
run: ['start', 'refuse tabs in the parser', '--scope', 'lib']
expect:
exit: 0
stdout_contains: ['^started t-', 'INFO overlap', 'claims lib']
- id: the-worker-strays
note: 'The worker makes the change it was asked for, and also edits a note under docs, which the task never claimed.'
worker: 'echo "tabs are refused" >> lib/a && echo "parser notes" >> docs/d'
expect:
exit: 0
- id: check-refuses-the-stray-file
note: 'check names the file outside the claimed scope and exits non-zero. It is a failure, not a warning.'
run: ['check']
expect:
exit: 10
stdout_contains: ['FAIL scope', 'docs/d']
- id: the-worker-says-it-is-done
note: 'The worker reports the task finished. finish evaluates the contract instead of believing it, and refuses.'
run: ['finish', '--outcome', 'completed', '--verify-command', 'sh test/parse.sh']
expect:
exit: 10
stdout_contains: ['FAIL scope', 'FAIL verification', 'refused']
- id: the-worker-reverts-the-stray-file
note: 'The stray edit is taken back.'
worker: 'git checkout -- docs/d'
expect:
exit: 0
- id: hand-over
note: 'The session ends. What the next one needs is written into the repository, not left in a transcript.'
run: ['handover']
stdin: challenge-handover.md
expect:
exit: 0
files_exist: ['.ai/local/state/handovers']
- id: the-next-session-resumes
note: 'A new session asks the repository what it needs to know, and gets the task, its scope and the handover back.'
run: ['context']
expect:
exit: 0
stdout_contains: ['## TASK', 'LATEST COMPATIBLE HANDOVER', 'name the column']
- id: finish-refuses-a-failing-verification
note: 'Scope is clean now, but the repository''s own test still fails. finish runs it and refuses again.'
run: ['finish', '--outcome', 'completed', '--verify-command', 'sh test/parse.sh']
expect:
exit: 10
stdout_contains: ['OK +scope', 'FAIL verification', 'refused']
stdout_not_contains: ['FAIL scope']
- id: the-worker-finishes-the-work
note: 'The worker does what the handover said was left.'
worker: 'echo "the message names the column" >> lib/a'
expect:
exit: 0
- id: finish-accepts
note: 'Every line of the contract passes, so the outcome is recorded, with the verification that proved it.'
run: ['finish', '--outcome', 'completed', '--verify-command', 'sh test/parse.sh']
expect:
exit: 0
stdout_contains: ['OK +scope', 'OK +verification', 'completed']
stdout_not_contains: ['FAIL']
then:
- 'a file outside the claimed scope is refused by check and by finish'
- 'a worker saying it is done is a claim finish evaluates, and a failing verification keeps it refused'
- 'the next session resumes from what the repository recorded, not from the conversation'
- 'the work is accepted only when every line of the contract passes'
The work is accepted exactly once, when the repository's own test passes and nothing outside
the claimed paths changed. The two earlier claims of being done were refused with the reason
named and the command that reproduces it. The next session started from the handover the
repository held, and the other worker in the same paths was named before anything was edited.
-
The task claims lib. Another worker already claims lib in a second worktree, and start says so before any file is touched.
started t-<id> profile=implementation scope=lib
INFO overlap repo-other — claims lib — contains your lib [reproduce: majordomus check --overlap]
next: majordomus context; checkpoint every 15m; majordomus check before claiming anything
- exit 0
- stdout_contains /^started t-/
- stdout_contains /INFO overlap/
- stdout_contains /claims lib/
-
2worker$ echo "tabs are refused" >> lib/a && echo "parser notes" >> docs/d
exit 0
The worker makes the change it was asked for, and also edits a note under docs, which the task never claimed.
-
check names the file outside the claimed scope and exits non-zero. It is a failure, not a warning.
OK knowledge records — 0 record(s) valid against knowledge/v1; every reference resolves [reproduce: majordomus knowledge check]
· checkpoint t-<id> — <timed against the checkpoint interval>
OK records ledger.jsonl — every line is a well-formed event
OK blockers t-<id> — none open
OK records decisions.md — every entry is attributable
FAIL scope docs/d — outside claimed scope (lib) [reproduce: git status --porcelain; git log --first-parent --no-merges --name-only --format= <sha>..HEAD]
OK state t-<id> — exact (head <head>)
INFO mesh t-<id> — the repository declares no enabled mesh
INFO use-case 30 advisory gap(s) — not covered by an active use case, and the policy does not require it: command:init command:update command:doctor command:watch command:start command:context command:checkpoint command:handover command:check command:finish command:history command:decision command:question command:prompt command:evidence command:skills command:capture command:search command:doctrine command:plan command:version command:session command:knowledge command:adr command:usecase command:rules command:migrate command:recover command:bench command:archive [reproduce: majordomus usecase coverage]
OK use-case 0 of 30 target(s) covered — every public command the policy requires is named and run by an active use case (policy use_cases.coverage)
INFO obligation t-<id> — the task declares no obligations
INFO gate t-<id> — this repository declares no CI model at .ai/repo/ci/gates.yaml; nothing can be planned
check: 12 finding(s), 1 failing
- exit 10
- stdout_contains /FAIL scope/
- stdout_contains /docs/d/
-
The worker reports the task finished. finish evaluates the contract instead of believing it, and refuses.
OK blockers t-<id> — none open
FAIL note t-<id> — no --note file and no handover for this task [reproduce: majordomus handover < note.md]
INFO regression t-<id> — profile implementation adds no requirement beyond the shared contract
FAIL scope docs/d — outside claimed scope (lib) [reproduce: git status --porcelain; git log --first-parent --no-merges --name-only --format= <sha>..HEAD]
OK state t-<id> — exact (head <head>)
INFO continuity t-<id> — applies to partial and blocked
INFO mesh t-<id> — the repository declares no enabled mesh
INFO use-case 30 advisory gap(s) — not covered by an active use case, and the policy does not require it: command:init command:update command:doctor command:watch command:start command:context command:checkpoint command:handover command:check command:finish command:history command:decision command:question command:prompt command:evidence command:skills command:capture command:search command:doctrine command:plan command:version command:session command:knowledge command:adr command:usecase command:rules command:migrate command:recover command:bench command:archive [reproduce: majordomus usecase coverage]
OK use-case 0 of 30 target(s) covered — every public command the policy requires is named and run by an active use case (policy use_cases.coverage)
FAIL verification t-<id> — sh test/parse.sh — exit 1, <s>s [reproduce: sh test/parse.sh]
INFO obligation t-<id> — the task declares no obligations
INFO gate t-<id> — this repository declares no CI model at .ai/repo/ci/gates.yaml; nothing can be planned
INFO gate t-<id> — not in verification.finish_requires
finish: refused, 3 unmet
blocking doctrines:
- majordomus.note-integrity
- majordomus.scope-integrity
- majordomus.verification-integrity
- exit 10
- stdout_contains /FAIL scope/
- stdout_contains /FAIL verification/
- stdout_contains /refused/
-
5worker$ git checkout -- docs/d
exit 0
The stray edit is taken back.
-
The session ends. What the next one needs is written into the repository, not left in a transcript.
.ai/local/state/handovers/<time>--main--<head>--<hash>.md
- exit 0
- file_exists .ai/local/state/handovers
-
A new session asks the repository what it needs to know, and gets the task, its scope and the handover back.
# Majordomus context — <time>
# a projection of durable state, not a source of truth: validate every line against git
## GIT
repository <repo>
branch main
head <sha>
working_tree dirty
task_record exact (recorded head <head>)
## TASK
id t-<id>
task refuse tabs in the parser
profile implementation
owner <owner>
outcome active
scope lib
started <time> (<age> ago)
checkpoint <time> (<age> ago, interval 15m)
## PROFILE implementation
capability standard
effort medium
verbosity concise
presentation engineering
verification verify command
output outcome, changes, verification, blockers, next_action
## CONTEXT DOCUMENTS (for the scope, root first; majordomus context explain <path>)
lib ai.layer
## KNOWLEDGE (candidates awaiting review on this branch; majordomus knowledge candidates)
No knowledge candidates await review on this branch. That is an answer, not a gap: `majordomus knowledge candidates` lists every branch.
## DECISIONS (5 most recent for this task)
(none)
## LATEST COMPATIBLE HANDOVER (.ai/local/state/handovers/<time>--main--<head>--<hash>.md)
match same_worktree_same_branch
git state exact
created <time> (<age> ago)
task t-<id>
# Objective
refuse tabs in the parser
# Current State
tabs are refused; the stray note under docs is reverted; the parser's test still fails
# Next Action
make the message name the column, then run the parser's test again
## FILES TOUCHED IN SCOPE (1)
lib/a
## EXCLUDED
- history — profile implementation sets context.recent_history_depth: 0
## BUDGET
57 of 300 lines
- exit 0
- stdout_contains /## TASK/
- stdout_contains /LATEST COMPATIBLE HANDOVER/
- stdout_contains /name the column/
-
Scope is clean now, but the repository's own test still fails. finish runs it and refuses again.
OK blockers t-<id> — none open
OK note t-<id> — <time>--main--<head>--<hash>.md
INFO regression t-<id> — profile implementation adds no requirement beyond the shared contract
OK scope t-<id> — 1 touched file(s), all within scope
OK state t-<id> — exact (head <head>)
INFO continuity t-<id> — applies to partial and blocked
INFO mesh t-<id> — the repository declares no enabled mesh
INFO use-case 30 advisory gap(s) — not covered by an active use case, and the policy does not require it: command:init command:update command:doctor command:watch command:start command:context command:checkpoint command:handover command:check command:finish command:history command:decision command:question command:prompt command:evidence command:skills command:capture command:search command:doctrine command:plan command:version command:session command:knowledge command:adr command:usecase command:rules command:migrate command:recover command:bench command:archive [reproduce: majordomus usecase coverage]
OK use-case 0 of 30 target(s) covered — every public command the policy requires is named and run by an active use case (policy use_cases.coverage)
FAIL verification t-<id> — sh test/parse.sh — exit 1, <s>s [reproduce: sh test/parse.sh]
INFO obligation t-<id> — the task declares no obligations
INFO gate t-<id> — this repository declares no CI model at .ai/repo/ci/gates.yaml; nothing can be planned
INFO gate t-<id> — not in verification.finish_requires
finish: refused, 1 unmet
blocking doctrines:
- majordomus.verification-integrity
- exit 10
- stdout_contains /OK +scope/
- stdout_contains /FAIL verification/
- stdout_contains /refused/
- stdout_not_contains /FAIL scope/
-
9worker$ echo "the message names the column" >> lib/a
exit 0
The worker does what the handover said was left.
-
Every line of the contract passes, so the outcome is recorded, with the verification that proved it.
OK blockers t-<id> — none open
OK note t-<id> — <time>--main--<head>--<hash>.md
INFO regression t-<id> — profile implementation adds no requirement beyond the shared contract
OK scope t-<id> — 1 touched file(s), all within scope
OK state t-<id> — exact (head <head>)
INFO continuity t-<id> — applies to partial and blocked
INFO mesh t-<id> — the repository declares no enabled mesh
INFO use-case 30 advisory gap(s) — not covered by an active use case, and the policy does not require it: command:init command:update command:doctor command:watch command:start command:context command:checkpoint command:handover command:check command:finish command:history command:decision command:question command:prompt command:evidence command:skills command:capture command:search command:doctrine command:plan command:version command:session command:knowledge command:adr command:usecase command:rules command:migrate command:recover command:bench command:archive [reproduce: majordomus usecase coverage]
OK use-case 0 of 30 target(s) covered — every public command the policy requires is named and run by an active use case (policy use_cases.coverage)
OK verification t-<id> — sh test/parse.sh — exit 0, <s>s, tree <tree>
INFO obligation t-<id> — the task declares no obligations
INFO gate t-<id> — this repository declares no CI model at .ai/repo/ci/gates.yaml; nothing can be planned
INFO gate t-<id> — not in verification.finish_requires
finish: t-<id> completed
- exit 0
- stdout_contains /OK +scope/
- stdout_contains /OK +verification/
- stdout_contains /completed/
- stdout_not_contains /FAIL/
The chain from this page to the code: the use case names commands, rules and claims; each rule is dispatched from the registry and each claim names the test that proves it; the scenario above executed the commands. Nothing in this chain is prose about intent.
Computed from what they share: claims, rules, commands, category, applications. Nobody maintains this list.