Skip to content

Serve the repository's AI layer to every AI client through one shared server

Open the repository in any client the tool declares a provider for (docs/generated/providers.md) and have each of them read the same rules, prompts and knowledge over MCP from one process, seeing each other.

guaranteed Serving the layer to AI clientsbasicoperatoragentwrites state

Situation

Three AI clients are open in one checkout. Each reads .ai/ by hand, none knows the others exist, and the first thing two of them do is edit the same file. The layer is the contract, but nothing serves it and nothing shows who is working where.

What you run

  • init: writes the .ai/ layer the executable serves; the client configurations at the root (.mcp.json, .gemini/settings.json, .codex/config.toml) start bin/majordomus-mcp, which builds the Rust executable when it must
  • doctor: proves the layer and its projections are consistent before a client reads them, and that the MCP client autostart is wired

Scenario

setup: installed-wired
given:
  - 'a repository with the layer installed and its projections generated'
steps:
  - id: nothing-to-add
    run: ['init', '--extend']
    note: 'the layer is complete; the client configurations at the root start the server'
    expect:
      exit: 0
      stdout_contains: ['nothing to add']
  - id: healthy
    run: ['doctor']
    note: 'what the server will serve is what doctor proved'
    expect:
      exit: 0
      stdout_contains: ['doctor: 0 failure']
then:
  - 'an MCP client opened here starts the shared server through bin/majordomus-mcp and reads the same layer'

Outcome

The first client to open a checkout is its shared server; every later client of that checkout attaches to it, and a linked worktree, being a checkout, has one of its own. Each client sees the same objects as majordomus:// resources and the same tools, lists every worker of the repository with majordomus_peers - its own board and the board of every other checkout, each peer stamped with the worktree it is in (ADR 0044) - and announces its intent and the paths it will touch with majordomus_announce. A lease a client leaves behind never locks the others out, and a client that cannot serve says so instead of serving a degraded layer silently.

The scenario

Executed against the real tool, in a repository prepared by installed-wired, every time this site is generated. What follows is not a description of what should happen; it is what happened.

given

  • a repository with the layer installed and its projections generated

when

  1. 1majordomus init --extend
  2. 2majordomus doctor

then

  • an MCP client opened here starts the shared server through bin/majordomus-mcp and reads the same layer

What the tool did

Evidence of the run this page was generated from: pass, 2 step(s). Output is normalised: the repository's path, timestamps, ids and durations are placeholders; nothing else is edited.

Tested by test/cases/94_use_cases.sh, which runs every scenario and refuses a step whose recorded output is not what it produced.

  1. the layer is complete; the client configurations at the root start the server

    nothing to add; .ai/ already carries every file the skeleton seeds
    local state: .ai/local/state/ (ignored by git; this checkout's own)
    next: majordomus update      # generate the provider instruction files named in the policy
    next: majordomus doctor      # verify nothing is declared that is not wired
    hooks are not installed by init; add these two lines yourself, doctor verifies them:
      pre-commit: majordomus doctor || exit $?
      pre-push:   majordomus finish --check || exit $?
    • exit 0
    • stdout_contains /nothing to add/
  2. what the server will serve is what doctor proved

    OK   knowledge   graph — buildable here: 100 node(s), 58 edge(s), compiled into a temporary file and removed; no stored index to go stale
    OK   knowledge   records — 0 record(s) valid against knowledge/v1; every reference resolves  [reproduce: majordomus knowledge check]
    OK   knowledge   candidates — 0 await review, cap 40
    OK   layout      .ai/manifest.yaml — schema ai-repository/v1
    OK   layout      .ai/repo/scope.yaml — version 1; 14 in pathspec(s); every key is one the schema declares
    OK   layout      .ai/local/ — ignored, and nothing under it is tracked
    OK   layout      .ai/ — every section the manifest names exists; the layer is readable without the tool
    OK   layout      .ai/repo/prompts — present
    OK   layout      .ai/local/state/handovers — present, 0 record(s)
    OK   layout      .ai/local/state/checkpoints — present, 0 record(s)
    OK   records     ledger.jsonl — every line is a well-formed event
    OK   policy      39 key(s) — every policy value the code reads is declared, with no reader-side default
    OK   bootstrap   3 projection(s) — each points at .ai/README.md, carries no rule of its own and names only rules in force
    OK   catalogue   0 use case(s), 0 application(s) — every command, doctrine, claim, responsibility, category, setup and cross-reference resolves, both directions
    OK   context     .ai/ — 20 context document(s) carry the contract; ids unique, references resolve, no final document superseded, no cycle  [reproduce: majordomus context validate]
    OK   policy      .ai/repo/policy.yaml — parsed, version 1
    OK   profiles    4 files — parsed; default 'implementation' exists
    INFO adr         .ai/repo/adrs/ — no decisions; nothing to validate
    OK   records     decisions.md — every entry is attributable
    INFO project     .ai/repo/project — no canonical project model here; nothing to validate
    OK   command     surface — 30 public command(s), reconciled against the dispatch table  [reproduce: majordomus doctor]
    OK   doctrine    50 of 61 rule(s) carry a validator — validator, dispatch, propagation, test and CI resolve for every one of the 50; the remaining 11 declare no validator and this check does not examine them
    OK   wiring      doctor-on-commit — wired via .githooks/pre-commit
    OK   wiring      finish-on-push — wired via .githooks/pre-push
    OK   command     coverage — every public command is exercised and refuted  [reproduce: bash test/run.sh 31_command_coverage]
    OK   resolver    handovers — no record for this worktree and branch (absence, not a stale match)  [reproduce: majordomus handover --resolve]
    OK   lifecycle   activity — 0 episode(s) opened here; too few to judge whether the writers stopped
    OK   knowledge   wiring — the close path and the compaction adapter call the deriver
    OK   knowledge   deriver — no episode has closed here; nothing to judge
    INFO project     .ai/repo/project — no canonical project model here; nothing to validate
    OK   projection  AGENTS.md — content matches its stamp
    OK   projection  CLAUDE.md — content matches its stamp
    OK   projection  GEMINI.md — content matches its stamp
    OK   budget      AGENTS.md — 42 lines, budget 150
    OK   links       AGENTS.md — all references resolve
    OK   counts      AGENTS.md — no hardcoded counts
    OK   context     builder — 21 lines, budget 300  [reproduce: majordomus context]
    OK   capture     share/schemas/majordomus/capture/capture.v1 — 2 file(s) describe majordomus.capture/v1 at the path the identifier derives: the record as JSON Schema, the document as protobuf
    OK   capture     .ai/local/prompts — ignored and untracked
    OK   capture     .ai/local/prompts — no records yet; the archive is empty
    OK   capture     .ai/local/prompts — every prompt is present as all three: the record, the Markdown and the YAML
    OK   prompts     .ai/local/prompts — the archive and every record in it are readable by their owner only
    OK   prompts     .ai/local/prompts — no records yet; the archive is empty
    OK   prompt      4 asset(s) — front matter valid, every token known
    OK   records     open-questions.md — every entry parses
    OK   retention   ledger — 1 lines, cap 5000
    OK   retention   handovers — 0 files, cap 200
    OK   retention   checkpoints — 0 files, cap 500
    OK   retention   sessions — 0 records, cap 500
    INFO project     .ai/repo/project — no canonical project model here; nothing to validate
    OK   rules       .ai/repo/rules/vendor/majordomus — every file matches the manifest (1 (1.0.0-alpha.8))
    OK   rules       61 rule(s) — resolve in one deterministic order; vendored baseline plus project rules, no override — 51 carry a validator, 10 are normative text this tool does not check
    OK   rules       blocking — all 44 blocking rule(s) carry a validator
    OK   schema      rules — 61 rule(s) resolve in one order: the vendored baseline in manifest order, then the project's, as a dependency graph
    OK   schema      share/kinds.yaml — 37 kind(s); every one that carries metadata declares a schema
    OK   schema      share/schemas — 54 schema(s), each valid JSON and each applied — by a kind, through an allow-list the tool reads, by a validator that names it, or as a generated document's contract (15)
    OK   records     0 record(s) — every changed_files names work, not generated or local state
    OK   session     .ai/local/session-contexts — ignored and untracked
    OK   session     .ai/local/session-contexts — no working contexts yet; the store is empty
    INFO skill       .ai/repo/skills/ — no skills; nothing to validate
    OK   skill       reachable — no personal command or skill shares a name with a projected skill  [reproduce: majordomus run editors.status]
    INFO use-case    30 advisory gap(s) — not covered by an active use case, and the policy does not require it: command:init command:update command:doctor command:watch command:start command:context command:checkpoint command:handover command:check command:finish command:history command:decision command:question command:prompt command:evidence command:skills command:capture command:search command:doctrine command:plan command:version command:session command:knowledge command:adr command:usecase command:rules command:migrate command:recover command:bench command:archive  [reproduce: majordomus usecase coverage]
    OK   use-case    0 of 30 target(s) covered — every public command the policy requires is named and run by an active use case (policy use_cases.coverage)
    INFO env         - — bash <version>, git <version>, jq <version>, shellcheck present
    WARN clone       unpushed — commits on no remote: main(2) — work on one disk is invisible to every other session and cannot be integrated  [reproduce: git push -u origin <branch>]
    OK   clone       uncommitted — no linked worktree, so no uncommitted work can sit in one
    INFO clone       trunk — no remote-tracking branch, so this checkout's distance from the remote trunk cannot be measured
    INFO clone       release — no remote-tracking branch, so whether the trunk's landed work is released cannot be measured
    ·    reasoning   <decided by the advisors and the executable of the recording machine>
    ·    layout      - — <judged when the recording machine has built the executable>
    ·    budget      doctor — <timed against the policy budget>
    doctor: 0 failure(s)
    • exit 0
    • stdout_contains /doctor: 0 failure/

Why the tool knows this

The chain from this page to the code: the use case names commands, rules and claims; each rule is dispatched from the registry and each claim names the test that proves it; the scenario above executed the commands. Nothing in this chain is prose about intent.

Over MCP the same layer is reached through majordomus_repository, majordomus_list, majordomus_get, majordomus_peers, majordomus_announce (the MCP surface).

The rules that make it hold

Guarantees exercised

Related use cases

Computed from what they share: claims, rules, commands, category, applications. Nobody maintains this list.

The moments this answers

Searches the titles and descriptions of every page this site publishes.