Architecture decision integrity

✕blocking A violation stops the command with exit 10.

The chain

A rule is enforced only when every link below holds. majordomus doctor resolves each one from the source on every run; this page shows what it resolved.

1. 1 Declared majordomus.adr-integrity
2. 2 Validator mj_validate_adr
3. 3 Runs under doctor, watch
4. 4 On violation exit 10
5. 5 Proved by test/cases/99_adr.sh
6. 6 Run by CI .github/workflows/validate.yml

Where it runs

• majordomus doctorIt checks governance only: is Majordomus itself healthy, and is every enforcement it declares actually wired here?
• majordomus watchWhat has drifted since the last update — policy, projections, state, retention.

What it lets us promise

• ○guaranteed An architecture decision is one file under the layer's adrs section, validated against the decision contract, with an identity nothing else claims, reciprocal supersession, and every reference it makes resolving
• ○guaranteed A decision states what it put in force as typed references, each one validated, and the reverse direction — what a rule, a document, an implementation or a case was decided by — is read from the knowledge graph rather than written down a second time
• ○guaranteed majordomus adr propose writes a decision with status proposed and refuses to write any other status, allocates its identity under a lock so concurrent workers never collide, and records what the decision was derived from

Read it here

majordomus doctrine show majordomus.adr-integrity
majordomus check --rule majordomus.adr-integrity