I1104 — Both namespaces carry their contracts, all the way down
Extend the directory-contract discipline that already governs `.ai/` to `.majordomus/`, so every directory of either namespace explains its purpose, its ownership, its lifecycle, the schemas that apply and how its contents are discovered.
BLOCKED wave 2 · p1 · implementation profile · parallel safe
Blocked. This issue cannot start until I1102 is done. The status is derived from that, not declared.
Objective
Extend the directory-contract discipline that already governs `.ai/` to `.majordomus/`, so every directory of either namespace explains its purpose, its ownership, its lifecycle, the schemas that apply and how its contents are discovered.
Why
A control-plane directory nobody documented is where the next copy of something appears. The mechanism for preventing that already exists on one side of the boundary and simply does not run on the other.
Current state
ADR 0011 established that every directory of the layer carries a contract, and a validator enforces it under `.ai/`. `.majordomus/` has no such requirement.
Desired state
The same validator covers both namespaces, and the effective context for an artifact composes from the contracts above it in either.
Scope
- .majordomus
Out of scope
- A second contract format for the second namespace
- Duplicating a parent's instructions in every child
Dependencies
What waits on this
Acceptance criteria
- Every directory of both namespaces carries a contract with valid typed front matter, and a missing one fails the existing validator
- Each states purpose, ownership and lifecycle, the schemas that apply, and how its contents are discovered and extended
- Contracts compose rather than repeat: a child adds to its ancestors and never restates them
- The same mechanism serves both namespaces, with no second format
Validation
- bin/majordomus doctor
- bash test/run.sh
Evidence required
- contracts_present
- composition_holds
Evidence
None recorded. Every token above needs a command or an artifact behind it before this issue can be completed; narrative is refused.
Risk
Mechanical coverage produces mechanical documents. A contract that says nothing a reader could not guess is a cost with no benefit, and the review has to say so.
Timeline
- started
- —
- verified
- —
- completed
- —
Those three fields, the evidence above and the state of the dependencies are all the status is made of. There is no status field to disagree with them.
Canonical record: .ai/repo/project/issues/I1104.yaml. Read it back with majordomus plan show I1104.