Skip to content

Find out what has drifted since anyone last looked

Ask what has moved, rather than whether anything is wrong.

guaranteed Drift and reconciliationbasicmaintainerwrites state

Situation

The policy changed but the projections did not. A generated file was hand-edited. A task record describes a commit the branch no longer contains. Each is invisible until something downstream behaves oddly.

What you run

  • watch: reports drift across policy, projections, state, scope, records and retention
  • update: --dry-run shows what regeneration would change before it changes it

Scenario

setup: policy-drifted
given:
  - 'installed and generated, then the policy was edited without regenerating'
steps:
  - id: detect
    run: ['watch']
    note: 'the projection no longer matches the policy it was rendered from'
    expect:
      exit: 11
      stdout_contains: ['DRIFT']
  - id: regenerate
    run: ['update']
    note: 'the projections are rendered again from the edited policy'
    expect:
      exit: 0
      stdout_contains: ['CLAUDE.md']
  - id: clean
    run: ['watch']
    note: 'nothing disagrees any more'
    expect:
      exit: 0
      stdout_contains: ['watch: 0 drift']
  - id: what-happened
    run: ['history']
    note: 'the ledger says what changed and when'
    expect:
      exit: 0
      stdout_contains: ['projections.updated']
then:
  - 'drift is a deterministic disagreement between policy, projection and git, reported by name'

Outcome

Every finding carries the command that reproduces it, and the same rules produce it as produce the failures — one vocabulary, one registry, a different question.

The scenario

Executed against the real tool, in a repository prepared by policy-drifted, every time this site is generated. What follows is not a description of what should happen; it is what happened.

given

  • installed and generated, then the policy was edited without regenerating

when

  1. 1majordomus watch
  2. 2majordomus update
  3. 3majordomus watch
  4. 4majordomus history

then

  • drift is a deterministic disagreement between policy, projection and git, reported by name

What the tool did

Evidence of the run this page was generated from: pass, 4 step(s). Output is normalised: the repository's path, timestamps, ids and durations are placeholders; nothing else is edited.

Tested by test/cases/94_use_cases.sh, which runs every scenario and refuses a step whose recorded output is not what it produced.

  1. the projection no longer matches the policy it was rendered from

    OK   knowledge   graph — buildable here: 100 node(s), 58 edge(s), compiled into a temporary file and removed; no stored index to go stale
    OK   layout      .ai/manifest.yaml — schema ai-repository/v1
    OK   layout      .ai/repo/scope.yaml — version 1; 14 in pathspec(s); every key is one the schema declares
    OK   layout      .ai/local/ — ignored, and nothing under it is tracked
    OK   layout      .ai/ — every section the manifest names exists; the layer is readable without the tool
    INFO checkpoint  - — no active task
    OK   records     ledger.jsonl — every line is a well-formed event
    OK   policy      39 key(s) — every policy value the code reads is declared, with no reader-side default
    OK   bootstrap   3 projection(s) — each points at .ai/README.md, carries no rule of its own and names only rules in force
    OK   catalogue   0 use case(s), 0 application(s) — every command, doctrine, claim, responsibility, category, setup and cross-reference resolves, both directions
    OK   context     .ai/ — 20 context document(s) carry the contract; ids unique, references resolve, no final document superseded, no cycle  [reproduce: majordomus context validate]
    DRIFT policy      .ai/repo/policy.yaml — policy or profiles changed after the last update of AGENTS.md CLAUDE.md GEMINI.md  [reproduce: majordomus update --dry-run]
    INFO adr         .ai/repo/adrs/ — no decisions; nothing to validate
    OK   records     decisions.md — every entry is attributable
    INFO project     .ai/repo/project — no canonical project model here; nothing to validate
    OK   command     surface — 30 public command(s), reconciled against the dispatch table  [reproduce: majordomus doctor]
    OK   command     coverage — every public command is exercised and refuted  [reproduce: bash test/run.sh 31_command_coverage]
    OK   resolver    handovers — no record for this worktree and branch (absence, not a stale match)  [reproduce: majordomus handover --resolve]
    OK   lifecycle   activity — 0 episode(s) opened here; too few to judge whether the writers stopped
    OK   knowledge   wiring — the close path and the compaction adapter call the deriver
    OK   knowledge   deriver — no episode has closed here; nothing to judge
    INFO project     .ai/repo/project — no canonical project model here; nothing to validate
    OK   projection  AGENTS.md — content matches its stamp
    OK   projection  CLAUDE.md — content matches its stamp
    OK   projection  GEMINI.md — content matches its stamp
    OK   context     builder — 21 lines, budget 300  [reproduce: majordomus context]
    OK   capture     share/schemas/majordomus/capture/capture.v1 — 2 file(s) describe majordomus.capture/v1 at the path the identifier derives: the record as JSON Schema, the document as protobuf
    OK   capture     .ai/local/prompts — ignored and untracked
    OK   capture     .ai/local/prompts — no records yet; the archive is empty
    OK   capture     .ai/local/prompts — every prompt is present as all three: the record, the Markdown and the YAML
    OK   prompts     .ai/local/prompts — the archive and every record in it are readable by their owner only
    OK   prompts     .ai/local/prompts — no records yet; the archive is empty
    OK   prompt      4 asset(s) — front matter valid, every token known
    OK   records     open-questions.md — every entry parses
    OK   retention   ledger — 1 lines, cap 5000
    OK   retention   handovers — 0 files, cap 200
    OK   retention   checkpoints — 0 files, cap 500
    OK   retention   sessions — 0 records, cap 500
    INFO project     .ai/repo/project — no canonical project model here; nothing to validate
    OK   rules       .ai/repo/rules/vendor/majordomus — every file matches the manifest (1 (1.0.0-alpha.8))
    OK   rules       61 rule(s) — resolve in one deterministic order; vendored baseline plus project rules, no override — 51 carry a validator, 10 are normative text this tool does not check
    OK   rules       blocking — all 44 blocking rule(s) carry a validator
    OK   schema      rules — 61 rule(s) resolve in one order: the vendored baseline in manifest order, then the project's, as a dependency graph
    OK   schema      share/kinds.yaml — 37 kind(s); every one that carries metadata declares a schema
    OK   schema      share/schemas — 54 schema(s), each valid JSON and each applied — by a kind, through an allow-list the tool reads, by a validator that names it, or as a generated document's contract (15)
    INFO scope       - — no active task
    OK   session     .ai/local/session-contexts — ignored and untracked
    OK   session     .ai/local/session-contexts — no working contexts yet; the store is empty
    INFO skill       .ai/repo/skills/ — no skills; nothing to validate
    OK   skill       reachable — no personal command or skill shares a name with a projected skill  [reproduce: majordomus run editors.status]
    INFO state       - — no active task
    ·    budget      watch — <timed against the policy budget>
    INFO state       - — no active task
    watch: 1 drift finding(s)
    • exit 11
    • stdout_contains /DRIFT/
  2. the projections are rendered again from the edited policy

    update AGENTS.md
    update CLAUDE.md
    update GEMINI.md
    generated 3 target(s) from policy a161e8624c17; each carries its own stamp
    • exit 0
    • stdout_contains /CLAUDE.md/
  3. nothing disagrees any more

    OK   knowledge   graph — buildable here: 100 node(s), 58 edge(s), compiled into a temporary file and removed; no stored index to go stale
    OK   layout      .ai/manifest.yaml — schema ai-repository/v1
    OK   layout      .ai/repo/scope.yaml — version 1; 14 in pathspec(s); every key is one the schema declares
    OK   layout      .ai/local/ — ignored, and nothing under it is tracked
    OK   layout      .ai/ — every section the manifest names exists; the layer is readable without the tool
    INFO checkpoint  - — no active task
    OK   records     ledger.jsonl — every line is a well-formed event
    OK   policy      39 key(s) — every policy value the code reads is declared, with no reader-side default
    OK   bootstrap   3 projection(s) — each points at .ai/README.md, carries no rule of its own and names only rules in force
    OK   catalogue   0 use case(s), 0 application(s) — every command, doctrine, claim, responsibility, category, setup and cross-reference resolves, both directions
    OK   context     .ai/ — 20 context document(s) carry the contract; ids unique, references resolve, no final document superseded, no cycle  [reproduce: majordomus context validate]
    OK   policy      policy+profiles — match the last update (<hash12>)
    INFO adr         .ai/repo/adrs/ — no decisions; nothing to validate
    OK   records     decisions.md — every entry is attributable
    INFO project     .ai/repo/project — no canonical project model here; nothing to validate
    OK   command     surface — 30 public command(s), reconciled against the dispatch table  [reproduce: majordomus doctor]
    OK   command     coverage — every public command is exercised and refuted  [reproduce: bash test/run.sh 31_command_coverage]
    OK   resolver    handovers — no record for this worktree and branch (absence, not a stale match)  [reproduce: majordomus handover --resolve]
    OK   lifecycle   activity — 0 episode(s) opened here; too few to judge whether the writers stopped
    OK   knowledge   wiring — the close path and the compaction adapter call the deriver
    OK   knowledge   deriver — no episode has closed here; nothing to judge
    INFO project     .ai/repo/project — no canonical project model here; nothing to validate
    OK   projection  AGENTS.md — content matches its stamp
    OK   projection  CLAUDE.md — content matches its stamp
    OK   projection  GEMINI.md — content matches its stamp
    OK   context     builder — 21 lines, budget 300  [reproduce: majordomus context]
    OK   capture     share/schemas/majordomus/capture/capture.v1 — 2 file(s) describe majordomus.capture/v1 at the path the identifier derives: the record as JSON Schema, the document as protobuf
    OK   capture     .ai/local/prompts — ignored and untracked
    OK   capture     .ai/local/prompts — no records yet; the archive is empty
    OK   capture     .ai/local/prompts — every prompt is present as all three: the record, the Markdown and the YAML
    OK   prompts     .ai/local/prompts — the archive and every record in it are readable by their owner only
    OK   prompts     .ai/local/prompts — no records yet; the archive is empty
    OK   prompt      4 asset(s) — front matter valid, every token known
    OK   records     open-questions.md — every entry parses
    OK   retention   ledger — 2 lines, cap 5000
    OK   retention   handovers — 0 files, cap 200
    OK   retention   checkpoints — 0 files, cap 500
    OK   retention   sessions — 0 records, cap 500
    INFO project     .ai/repo/project — no canonical project model here; nothing to validate
    OK   rules       .ai/repo/rules/vendor/majordomus — every file matches the manifest (1 (1.0.0-alpha.8))
    OK   rules       61 rule(s) — resolve in one deterministic order; vendored baseline plus project rules, no override — 51 carry a validator, 10 are normative text this tool does not check
    OK   rules       blocking — all 44 blocking rule(s) carry a validator
    OK   schema      rules — 61 rule(s) resolve in one order: the vendored baseline in manifest order, then the project's, as a dependency graph
    OK   schema      share/kinds.yaml — 37 kind(s); every one that carries metadata declares a schema
    OK   schema      share/schemas — 54 schema(s), each valid JSON and each applied — by a kind, through an allow-list the tool reads, by a validator that names it, or as a generated document's contract (15)
    INFO scope       - — no active task
    OK   session     .ai/local/session-contexts — ignored and untracked
    OK   session     .ai/local/session-contexts — no working contexts yet; the store is empty
    INFO skill       .ai/repo/skills/ — no skills; nothing to validate
    OK   skill       reachable — no personal command or skill shares a name with a projected skill  [reproduce: majordomus run editors.status]
    INFO state       - — no active task
    ·    budget      watch — <timed against the policy budget>
    INFO state       - — no active task
    watch: 0 drift finding(s)
    • exit 0
    • stdout_contains /watch: 0 drift/
  4. the ledger says what changed and when

    <time>  projections.updated -                      <head>  targets=3
    <time>  projections.updated -                      <head>  targets=3
    • exit 0
    • stdout_contains /projections.updated/

Why the tool knows this

The chain from this page to the code: the use case names commands, rules and claims; each rule is dispatched from the registry and each claim names the test that proves it; the scenario above executed the commands. Nothing in this chain is prose about intent.

The rules that make it hold

Guarantees exercised

Related use cases

Computed from what they share: claims, rules, commands, category, applications. Nobody maintains this list.

The moments this answers

Searches the titles and descriptions of every page this site publishes.